What is the Meaning & Definition of logical reasoning

The logic is an auxiliary science. This means providing a useful knowledge to the rest of the disciplines and knowledge in general. Logic provides a formal structure that is part of the mental processes of understanding. The formal structure of the logic is formed from a series of laws, rules and logical principles, which are considered valid and without which the rational thought does not make sense. The rules of logic, the best known are the following: identity law, law of non-contradiction, the law of the excluded middle, rules of inference or the principle of sufficient reason. These rules and others allow that we can argue with a logical reasoning. In other words, so that the ideas have consistency and a certain order, it is essential that an argument is based on a logical reasoning.

Logical reasoning in law

In the area of law laws are the frame of reference through which sets an order that regulates social activity. These laws are used by judges, lawyers, as well as by all the actors involved in any legal activity. So the arguments used are consistent and valid should follow a logical reasoning.

Foundations of the legal structure

It is possible to speak of a logic in the field of law when the fundamental principles of the law are respected. On the other hand, there are a number of technical elements that are part of the legal logic: building hypothesis, approach to a problem, the internal coherence of data or evidence, the cause-effect relationship, etc. And all of this, using a deductive analysis (which goes from the general to the particular) or inductive (part specific data until you obtain a generalization). Thus, a logical reasoning in law is one that serves to argue ideas with some purpose (a judge for a ruling or a lawyer to defend his client).

A significant example

To illustrate the concept of logical reasoning, it is worth presenting a simple example, namely logical reasoning based on the inductive method. There is an observer who will record that an Ant is black and then observes that other ants have the same color. Finally, take out the conclusion that all the ants are black. In this case, the unpaved at the conclusion idea is based on each of the specific observations made. This logical reasoning is valid, but if it appears a different color Ant would be it. In conclusion, any idea, argument, debate or analysis has an internal aspect which is not possible to circumvent: logical reasoning.
Article contributed by the team of collaborators.