What is the Meaning of tyranny | Definition and Concepts
Abuse of power, terror and cutting of individual freedoms Tyranny is a concept closely linked to the scope of the policy because it is precisely in the same where it is used to give an account of a political administration characterized by abuse of power, political decisions to impose by force. I.e., in the tyranny there is no possibility of dialogue, there is no place for Justice, equity, much less for the pursuit of consensus.
The tyrant, who is the individual that a Government of such exercises be imposed through the force of coercion policies considered correct and consistent to keep his power and imposing its will without disturbances, is clear.
Normally this type of Government accede to power through force, for example, lead and execute a coup ending to overthrowing the Government in practice, we must also say, generally, is weakened as a result of any special situation.
This weakness gives space and place for forces or politicians with personal aspirations of Government and power, land blows that will end up giving them that absolute authority seeking to achieve.
Fear, threat and specific violence, are usually the resources you use tyranny and the tyrant to frighten the people who govern and of course to achieve this is not subleve or resist to his designs, which are often not in tune with the law, equity, justice and respect.
In this state of things the State becomes a system fundamentally responsible for planting and to exercise terror against all those who oppose the regime proposed in exercise tyranny to be displayed. Always the tyrants have an armed wing, very, very violent, that it is responsible for keeping at Bay those who dare to rebel and will also punish those who have surpassed the limits proposed by the tyranny.
A strong presence in history
Unfortunately the world political history saves many examples of this type of Government, even today there are many Governments that Castle after democracy but in fact exert absolute tyranny.
We must make it clear that in no way this Government guarantees the development of the community and much less issues as freedom and access to basic rights.
Colloquial use
On the other hand, it is usual that this concept is used in conversational mode for the domain as a habit or that with a sense exerts on a person and making so that it dominates their actions and behaviours completely.
The tyrant, who is the individual that a Government of such exercises be imposed through the force of coercion policies considered correct and consistent to keep his power and imposing its will without disturbances, is clear.
Normally this type of Government accede to power through force, for example, lead and execute a coup ending to overthrowing the Government in practice, we must also say, generally, is weakened as a result of any special situation.
This weakness gives space and place for forces or politicians with personal aspirations of Government and power, land blows that will end up giving them that absolute authority seeking to achieve.
Fear, threat and specific violence, are usually the resources you use tyranny and the tyrant to frighten the people who govern and of course to achieve this is not subleve or resist to his designs, which are often not in tune with the law, equity, justice and respect.
In this state of things the State becomes a system fundamentally responsible for planting and to exercise terror against all those who oppose the regime proposed in exercise tyranny to be displayed. Always the tyrants have an armed wing, very, very violent, that it is responsible for keeping at Bay those who dare to rebel and will also punish those who have surpassed the limits proposed by the tyranny.
A strong presence in history
Unfortunately the world political history saves many examples of this type of Government, even today there are many Governments that Castle after democracy but in fact exert absolute tyranny.
We must make it clear that in no way this Government guarantees the development of the community and much less issues as freedom and access to basic rights.
Colloquial use
On the other hand, it is usual that this concept is used in conversational mode for the domain as a habit or that with a sense exerts on a person and making so that it dominates their actions and behaviours completely.