What is the meaning of Dissent? Concept and Definition of Dissent

Definition, Concept, Meaning, What is Dissent

Concepto de Disentir

1. Concept of dissent

dissent v. intr. Not be agree a person with another issue. differ, diverge. approve, assent.
OBS is conjugated as a boil.
Manual of the Vox Spanish language dictionary. © 2007 Larousse Editorial, S.L.
Intr. Not correspond to the feeling or opinion of another; think differently.
V. conjugation (picture) [4] as a boil.
Vox encyclopedic dictionary 1. © 2009 Larousse Editorial, S.L.
dissent (designers ' tiɾ)
intransitive verb
discreparcoincidir be in disagreement on something with another person at that point disagree with him.
Copyright © 2013 K Dictionaries Ltd.
disagree, disagree, desavenir is *, differ *, disonar *. agree, agree.
Dictionary of synonyms and antonyms of the Vox Spanish language Manual. © 2007 Larousse Editorial, S.L.

2 Meaning of dissent

The word dissent concerns the disagreement, the disagreement between two or more people on a question in particular. Dissent is, the lack of agreement on something.
Generally, at the behest of dissent is often propose is the realization of a debate, a discussion between stakeholders and which will have the Mission of bringing these to exchange the different points of view, presenting and if it is possible to reach an agreement on the issue.
Debate is one of the techniques of oral communication used in dealing with conflicting proposals on an issue. Most of them, as well as individuals who disagree, presents a moderator, who is who will have the responsibility of leading the debate, arranging exhibitions and allowing each to present orderly his point of view.
The concept that is at odds with the dissent is that of consensus, which is on the other hand, the agreement of all the people who make up an organization, entity, among others, around a topic of interest to the group.
It may happen that some groupings, for example policies, are lined up after a political ideology, but in relation to different issues, its members, each with experiences and subjectivities, are not fully in agreement on how to resolve certain conflicts. Here is where normally the dissent and is imperative immediately is find the way to alleviate it, through debate and discussion to avoid disagreements end up attacking the initial group marriage.
Noteworthy is that many times of dissent can reach consensus on an issue and this precisely is possible from the discussions and debates. For example, the solution of a problem that divides the views of a community, and as such generates dissent, can be overcome from the quiet discussion, and although various parties opposed do not arrive to modify their positions that can be done is to reach a consensus to resolve it in the best possible way.

3. Definition and what dissent

Modern, pluralistic and competitive democracy is based on the guarantee of dissent, which implies respect for a heterogeneous political culture, and the possibility of dissent with those who exercise power without being therefore outside the system but, on the contrary, is recognized as a necessary part of it. Is which the limit of dissent in this case? The legitimacy is the property of the political power of being accepted as most suitable for the political synthesis, based on which obtains political support. Legitimacy implies consensus, and consensus implies cultural homogeneity. The question involves whether this legitimacy, that consensus and that cultural homogeneity should encompass all the political field, including instrumental institutions and decisions, actions, and options of the rulers. Democratic choice says no, and that is enough consensus on the "basic rules of the game": the institutions created to discipline the conflict and protect the rights and freedoms of individuals and groups on the basis of the principle of majority tempered by minority guarantees, and can have dissent, and hence possibility of changeabove all the rest, while be questioned why the democratic legitimacy, but on the contrary, exalted insofar as this dissent runs effectively. (D. Fisichella - 1990)